Monday, 16 March 2015

Seeing Clearly: Ultrasound = Future of Diagnostic Imaging

The Beauty of Ultrasound Technology

Ultrasound is an example of biomimicry par excellence; even in a field rife with bio-inspired devices and medications, it stands out for its fidelity to nature. Consider that the three main components of an ultrasound device--a transducer to emit and capture the echoes of sound waves, a computer to process this data, and a screen to display the data real-time--are also utilized by organisms that rely on ultrasound for navigation. For instance, the sperm whale uses a highly developed transductive organ to emit sonar waves deep into the ocean in order to locate its prey. Bats famously use echolocation to capture insects after dusk. Each of these organisms uses 'transducer' organs to emit and capture waves, and their brains act as both 'computers' and 'screens' that allow them to see the world with a high level of accuracy when eyesight cannot do the job. Ultrasound devices in medicine today use the same technology to view the inner body real time, and they do such an effective job of this that a Harvard research team published a report in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2014 entitled Point-of-Care Ultrasound Imaging in Medical Education: Stop Listening and Look, which encourages physicians to supplement and possibly replace the stethoscope with diagnostic ultrasonography for physical examinations.

Clinical Areas of Vscan Ultrasound by GE Healthcare
The visual results of 3D/4D ultrasound technology have reached astonishing levels of detail, as a quick Google search shows. Most of the results display fetuses, but the clinical applications for ultrasound go far beyond fetal screening to include a wide range of diagnostic and even therapeutic uses as the chart on the right shows. In fact, ultrasound as a medical imaging modality features several distinct advantages, including real-time viewing, speed and ease-of-use, no radiation exposure, and no pain. Ultrasound is also the least expensive internal imaging modality--the typical alternatives being X-ray, CT/PET scans, or MRIs--and does a particularly good job of displaying soft tissue.

Ultrasound does have certain limitations. Air or gas disrupts the waves, as do bones, so ultrasounds are not a good method for viewing the bowels or bones beyond infancy. Especially corpulent patients attenuate the image quality due to too much soft tissue mass, and sometimes patients are covered with bandages or other materials that make ultrasound infeasible. Finally, the resolution of the images is not high enough for all medical imaging purposes.

These limitations aside, there's a great deal of diagnostic and triage value that ultrasound provides across a continuum of conditions, as Dr. Janice Boughton describes in her article Real-life examples of ultrasound in the developing world on KevinMD.


Handheld Ultrasound: A Quintessential Disruptive Technology

Lower-resourced clinical settings were early to foster Point-of-Care (PoC) ultrasound. In the United States, it seems that rural, county, and inner-city hospitals were early adopters of PoC in emergency and critical care situations. Dr. Resa Lewiss, in her excellent 2014 TEDMED talk, explains that in the early 1990s, there were fewer than five fellowships in emergency PoC ultrasound.  In the early 2000s, her mentors and friends were using ultrasound for global health and disaster relief in countries such as Ethiopia, Kosovo, Sierra Leone, and Indonesia. Today there are over 90 emergency medicine ultrasound fellowships in the USA. 

Ultrasound continues gaining popularity as effective diagnostic and procedural tools.  Emerging markets will continue to play an important role in fostering disruptive ultrasound products because of the relative ratio of patient need to paucity of clinical resources.
GE Healthcare's Vscan with Dual Probe
In fact, the two best-known examples of handheld ultrasound in the world were created in India. First, GE Healthcare India created the Vscan handheld ultrasound machine in 2009 as a means of providing affordable diagnostic data to physicians in India. The Vscan is a picture perfect example of a disruptive innovation in that it performs less well on certain dimensions than incumbents, but it does a 'good enough' job in the vast majority of use cases, and it does this at a price of $7,900. This price is still high for India, but is more accessible than the $25,000 to several hundred thousand dollar price tags for incumbent models.

Not to be outdone, Philips India developed the Visiq ultra-portable ultrasound device, releasing it in 2014 at a price of about $14,500. Visiq is a similarly compact setup to Vscan, but features a larger tablet-sized screen.

There's currently a lack of indigenous innovations from India to compete with these technologies as low-cost handheld ultrasound devices, though Trivitron in Chennai has made a laptop-sized ultrasound screening device called Prosound 2. However, at a price of $20,000, Trivitron does not appear to be marketing the product to compete with Visiq and Vscan.


Disrupting the U.S. Medical Imaging Market

In a certain sense, products only have disruptive potential, and Vscan and Visiq have disruptive potential in spades. Whether a product realizes its disruptive potential depends on whether management markets it disruptively. Will GE and Philips do this outside of emerging markets? Philips is not selling or marketing Visiq in the U.S., though it does have 510(k) approval from the FDA. GE Healthcare does sell Vscans in the U.S., but I have only read about their independent use by individual doctors, or about medical schools or teaching hospitals buying them in bulk for distribution to their students as a supplement to stethoscopes. In other words, neither GE nor Philips has marketed these products disruptively yet. This is not at all surprising: GE Healthcare would LOVE to upgrade their stethoscope market to using Vscans, but their sales people and finance department would protest mightily should the Vscan team aggressively disrupt their incumbent ultrasound imaging market in wealthy countries.

MobiUS SP1 Portable Ultrasound from Mobisante
GE and Philips hesitate to disrupt themselves, but what about grassroots innovators in the U.S.? Mobisante is a company in Redmond, Washington that received FDA approval in 2011 for a smartphone-enabled ultrasound device. Mobisante's MobiUS SP1 device (shown right), is priced similarly to GE's Vscan, retailing around $8,000. The company does not seem to have incurred much on the big device makers' core medical imaging turf, perhaps opting to gain a foothold first in medical education markets. Another niche market could come from supplying numerous non-medical providers of 'keepsake' fetal images, but this market may rapidly disappear: The FDA issued a warning in December, 2014 against the non-medical use of ultrasound devices in capturing fetal images or videos for keepsake purposes. 

Whether Mobisante can succeed in the core medical imaging market depends on many factors, but primarily on the quality of the product. So, has the image quality of handheld ultrasound machines achieved parity with incumbent technologies? Dr. Eric Topol, on page 119 of his new book The Patient Will See You Now, cites a study he and colleagues conducted at Scripps showing that the image resolution from the Mobisante and Vscan devices were "as good as the standard, large ultrasound hospital machine that costs over $300,000 for performing heart imaging." With more than 125 million ultrasound studies performed in the U.S. per year according to WSJ's Laura Landro, and an average charge of $800 per study, Topol estimates that these handheld devices could save the U.S. $50 billion per year in ultrasound study costs alone if adoption of handheld ultrasound devices became routine in clinical care. And this estimate doesn't even count ultrasound's potential to disrupt the other imaging modalities, which account for an additional 450 million studies per year in the U.S.

Reenita Das, a partner with Frost & Sullivan, adds color to this in her recent Forbes article Could Plug-and-Play Be the Future of Healthcare Diagnostics?. She points out that software enhancement tools are improving ultrasound image quality to such a degree that the technology can now be used to identify and monitor cancer and other diseases. She points out that avoiding the need for painful biopsy and dangerous radiocontrast agents where possible will "significantly reduce the pain and cost of treatment for cancer patients." In view of this, ultrasound's potential to begin replacing other imaging modalities appears much larger. Its ability to do that while simultaneously lowering costs is what makes it so valuable.


Questions For Discussion
  • Has the image quality of handheld ultrasound devices achieved parity with the larger, more expensive machines? 
  • Can companies like Mobisante effectively target the core medical imaging market in the U.S.? 
  • Could handheld ultrasound devices really save the U.S. over $50 billion per year?

13 comments:

  1. Valuable Addition--> A friend who was an executive at GE Healthcare made this comment to me by email: "The medical profession [plays] a role in adoption of disruptive technologies (not just the GE's and Philip's). Radiologists have been especially successful at introducing "quality criteria" and credentialing requirements to block other specialities from being reimbursed for imaging. And, physicians are still in a 'pay me to use it' mindset when it comes to technology - reimbursement is a prerequisite for technology adoption."

    ReplyDelete
  2. In fact, the two best-known examples of handheld ultrasound in the world were created in India.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A sometime employee of GE that worked on the Vscan Access device let me know that the Vscan was technically created within the Vingmed GE ultrasound group in Norway: http://www.heart-sfi.no/index.php?page=ge-vingmed-ultrasound-gevu . However, the media surrounding the product release still suggest that the inspiration was India.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Compared with many other diagnostic devices, ultrasound seems to be safe with no side effects. It doesn’t expose patients to harmful radiation like CT scans and X-rays does. Furthermore, it is comparatively inexpensive than other diagnostics and easily available in every healthcare facilities, thus it has become crucial in medicine. It is helpful in viewing the heart, kidneys, liver, blood vessels, and other organs of body.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Radiologists have been particularly fruitful at presenting It is useful in survey the heart, kidneys, liver, veins, and different organs of body .the media encompassing the item discharge still propose that the motivation was India.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Update! Here are the newest competitors in this fast-moving space:

    Interdependent systems:

    Fujifilm Sonosite is based in Bothell, Washington and their latest handheld device is called the iViz. https://www.sonosite.com/uk/sonosite-iviz

    GE Vscan is another HHUS costing about $8,000 and having a footprint about the size of a cellphone. (The global shipments of Vscan exceeded 15,000 units and adoption of the device continues to grow. 2010-Fall 2014.... like 4K per year). This is much higher than Sonosite’s iLook product, which only sold 1,000. http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/products/categories/ultrasound/vscan_portfolio


    Modular systems: Ultrasound in an app?

    Philips Lumify is compatible with any smart Android mobile device and offers both linear and phased array transducers for a monthly subscription price of $199. https://www.lumify.philips.com/web/

    Clarius ultrasound is viewed from a smartphone app and is a wireless hand-held device that features automated targeting and focusing in a rugged and affordable form factor. http://clarius.me/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ultrasound seems to be safe with no side effects. It doesn’t expose patients to harmful radiation like CT scans and X-rays does. Furthermore, it is comparatively inexpensive than other ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Worldwide ultrasound device market will surpass US$ 10 Billion landmark by 2021. United States is the leading country in the worldwide ultrasound device market. But in terms of numbers of Ultrasound; China has the highest market share.

    http://www.renub.com/ultrasound-device-market-numbers-and-forecast-worldwide-analysis-659-p.php

    ReplyDelete
  9. No doubt that, its an amazing article. Very helpful for Doctors, Medical students for their better knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Complaint Subject: Ultrasonic VScan healthcare devices/ Their employee using this devices at home to make revenge to their neighbour.

    Complaint Details:

    Employee Name: Nalinikanta Swain

    Office Address: Unit No.1, 4th Floor, Inventor Building, ITPL, Road Number 2, Vijaynagar, KIADB Export Promotion Industrial Area, Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560066

    He has been using these devices at home, and applying to my kid and family from since last two years. The hot ultrasonic wave inject our body and make us sick and weak. We have been already medicalised twice at Manipal and continuing medicine till now.

    ReplyDelete
  11. As title says Ultrasound is future of imaging industry and revolutionized it. It makes scanning more useful. Also, we have portable ultrasound machines as well which makes the job done very easily unlike the older bulky machines.

    redstonehealthcare.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. topscantool thanks for good information.
    obdhightech thanks for good information.

    ReplyDelete